This is the Vocab24 daily quiz of 4 August 2026, the same 26 questions the app served that day, on the day's vocabulary and editorial. One mark for a right answer, minus 0.25 for a wrong one; the explanation opens as soon as you tap.
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
WAFFLE
Explanation: Waffle means to speak or act indecisively without giving a definite answer; therefore, equivocate, which means to use unclear or evasive language, is the most appropriate synonym. Determine implies reaching a firm decision, disband means to break up an organized group, and mobilize means to organize people or resources for action.
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
SNAPPISH
Explanation: Snappish describes a person who is easily irritated and likely to respond sharply or rudely. Testy conveys the same tendency to become irritated quickly. Morose primarily means gloomy or sullen, while gentle and patient express qualities opposite to snappish behaviour.
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
ATTIRE
Explanation: Attire refers to clothes, particularly clothes worn for a specific occasion, and apparel has the same meaning. Isolation denotes separation, rostrum refers to a raised platform for speaking, and reticulation refers to the formation of a network-like pattern.
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
MARSHAL
Explanation: As a verb, marshal means to arrange, assemble, or organize people and resources systematically. Mobilize is therefore the closest synonym. Scatter expresses the opposite idea, waver means to hesitate, and reduce means to make something smaller or move someone to a lower position.
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
RETICULATE
Explanation: Reticulate means formed or arranged like a net, with several interconnected branches or lines. Linear, which describes something extending in a single line rather than forming a network, is the most appropriate opposite. Meshed, webbed, and interconnected all support the network-like sense of reticulate.
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
SULKY
Explanation: Sulky means silent and bad-tempered because of annoyance or disappointment. Cheerful is its clearest opposite because it describes a visibly happy and positive disposition. Morose, petulant, and sullen are all associated with gloomy, resentful, or bad-tempered behaviour.
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
DEMOTE
Explanation: Demote means to move someone to a lower rank, position, or status, whereas elevate means to raise someone to a higher position or level. Relegate, reduce, and depose all involve lowering, removing, or diminishing a person’s position and therefore cannot function as antonyms.
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
NAUSEATE
Explanation: Nauseate means to make someone feel sick or disgusted. Delight, which means to give great pleasure, expresses the opposite effect. Repel, sicken, and revolt all convey aversion or disgust and are therefore similar rather than opposite in meaning.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
A raised platform from which a preacher delivers a sermon in a church.
Explanation: A pulpit is specifically a raised platform used by a preacher while delivering a sermon in a church. Attire means clothing, tandem refers to a pair working together, marshal means to organize, and snappish describes an irritable manner.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
To move an employee to a lower rank, position, or status.
Explanation: Demote precisely means to move a person to a lower rank or status. Waffle means to speak indecisively, nauseate means to cause sickness or disgust, marshal means to organize, and reticulate means to form or arrange like a network.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
A pair of people or things working together in coordination.
Explanation: Tandem denotes a pair of people or things working together or positioned one behind the other. Attire refers to clothing, pulpit is a raised preaching platform, sulky describes silent resentment, and demote means to lower someone’s rank.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
Formed or arranged like a net or interconnected network.
Explanation: Reticulate describes something formed or arranged like a net, mesh, or interconnected network. Snappish and sulky describe kinds of temperament, attire means clothing, and waffle refers to indecisive or evasive speech.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
When repeatedly asked to announce a definite policy, the minister continued to __________ rather than commit himself to a clear position.
Explanation: Waffle appropriately completes the sentence because it means to speak or act indecisively without providing a clear answer. Marshal means to organize, demote means to lower someone’s rank, and attire relates to clothing, so none of them fits the context of evasive speech.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
Exhausted by the prolonged meeting, the manager became __________ and replied to routine questions in a sharp and irritated manner.
Explanation: Snappish is appropriate because the sentence specifically describes someone responding sharply and irritably. Sulky generally suggests silent and resentful behaviour rather than sharp replies, while reticulate describes a network-like arrangement and tandem refers to coordinated pairs.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
The botanist observed that the leaf possessed a __________ pattern of veins, with several smaller branches forming an interconnected network.
Explanation: Reticulate correctly describes veins arranged in a network-like or netted pattern. Sulky and snappish relate to human temperament, while tandem describes two people or things working together and cannot describe the branching structure of leaf veins.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
The investigators worked in tandem throughout the inquiry.
Explanation: To work in tandem means to work together in close coordination as a pair or team. Working independently or in isolation expresses the opposite idea, while scattering resources and remaining silently resentful are unrelated to the phrase.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
The priest addressed the congregation from the pulpit.
Explanation: The phrase means that the priest spoke from a raised church platform specifically intended for sermons. Speaking anonymously, organizing people, or wearing formal attire does not explain the meaning of from the pulpit.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
The spokesperson continued to waffle when asked for a definite reply.
Explanation: To continue to waffle means to remain indecisive or evasive instead of giving a direct answer. Reaching a firm decision is the opposite of waffling, while demoting an official and causing sickness represent the meanings of entirely different words.
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
The commander has marshal the available personnel before the emergency operation.
Explanation: The present perfect construction requires has followed by the past participle marshalled. Therefore, has marshalled the available personnel is grammatically correct. Option (a) incorrectly uses the participial form after has, while option (c) incorrectly places the base form marshal after had.
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
The two investigators worked in tandem to marshal the evidence before submitting their report.
Explanation: The expression worked in tandem is grammatically and idiomatically correct, and the infinitive to marshal correctly expresses the purpose of their coordinated work. The other alternatives misuse the expression in tandem or combine auxiliary verbs, participles, and infinitives incorrectly.
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
The foul smell from the drain began nauseated the pedestrians standing nearby.
Explanation: The verb begin can be followed by the infinitive to nauseate, making began to nauseate the pedestrians correct. Option (b) incorrectly combines a gerund with to the pedestrians, while option (c) wrongly places the past-tense form nauseated after to.
DIRECTIONS: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions. <br><br><br> The governing board of a century-old community chapel ordered an inquiry after receiving repeated complaints about unsafe repairs and incomplete financial records. At the first meeting, the chairperson <strong>marshalled</strong> invoices, inspection reports, and witness statements into a coherent sequence. Two independent examiners worked in <strong> tandem </strong>: one reviewed the accounts, while the other inspected the building. Their method was deliberately systematic, for <strong> reticulate </strong> cracks across the plaster suggested that the structural damage was not isolated but had spread like a network. <br><br> The administrative manager, who had already been <strong> demoted </strong> for neglecting maintenance duties, appeared in formal <strong> attire </strong> and stood near the <strong> pulpit </strong> while answering questions. However, his orderly appearance concealed considerable uncertainty. When asked whether the money reserved for drainage repairs had been properly used, he began to <strong> waffle </strong>, alternating between incomplete explanations and requests for additional time. <br><br> As the questioning continued, a <strong> nauseating </strong> smell from a blocked drain entered the hall. The manager became <strong> snappish </strong> with the examiners and later sat <strong> sulky </strong> and silent when reminded that the same defect had been reported several months earlier. <br><br> The board did not treat the manager’s temperament as conclusive proof of misconduct. Instead, it carefully distinguished personal conduct from documentary evidence. The inspectors’ records showed that invoices had been filed, but several repair entries lacked adequate supporting details. The board consequently postponed its final judgment, directed the examiners to verify every disputed payment, and required the manager to submit a precise written account. The episode demonstrated that organized evidence can restrain both hasty accusation and evasive defence: neither polished attire nor an irritable response can substitute for verifiable facts.
Which of the following can be most reasonably inferred from the passage?
Explanation: The board expressly separated the manager’s temperament from the documentary evidence and postponed its judgment until the disputed payments could be verified. Option (a) contradicts this approach, option (b) wrongly suggests that appearance guided the inquiry, and option (c) is incorrect because the missing details prompted further investigation.
DIRECTIONS: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions. <br><br><br> The governing board of a century-old community chapel ordered an inquiry after receiving repeated complaints about unsafe repairs and incomplete financial records. At the first meeting, the chairperson <strong>marshalled</strong> invoices, inspection reports, and witness statements into a coherent sequence. Two independent examiners worked in <strong> tandem </strong>: one reviewed the accounts, while the other inspected the building. Their method was deliberately systematic, for <strong> reticulate </strong> cracks across the plaster suggested that the structural damage was not isolated but had spread like a network. <br><br> The administrative manager, who had already been <strong> demoted </strong> for neglecting maintenance duties, appeared in formal <strong> attire </strong> and stood near the <strong> pulpit </strong> while answering questions. However, his orderly appearance concealed considerable uncertainty. When asked whether the money reserved for drainage repairs had been properly used, he began to <strong> waffle </strong>, alternating between incomplete explanations and requests for additional time. <br><br> As the questioning continued, a <strong> nauseating </strong> smell from a blocked drain entered the hall. The manager became <strong> snappish </strong> with the examiners and later sat <strong> sulky </strong> and silent when reminded that the same defect had been reported several months earlier. <br><br> The board did not treat the manager’s temperament as conclusive proof of misconduct. Instead, it carefully distinguished personal conduct from documentary evidence. The inspectors’ records showed that invoices had been filed, but several repair entries lacked adequate supporting details. The board consequently postponed its final judgment, directed the examiners to verify every disputed payment, and required the manager to submit a precise written account. The episode demonstrated that organized evidence can restrain both hasty accusation and evasive defence: neither polished attire nor an irritable response can substitute for verifiable facts.
The word marshalled, as used in the passage, most nearly means:
Explanation: In the passage, the chairperson arranged invoices, reports, and statements into a coherent sequence; therefore, marshalled means organized or assembled systematically. Scattered and dispersed is its opposite, while moving someone to a lower rank means demoted, and speaking without reaching a decision means waffled.
DIRECTIONS: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions. <br><br><br> The governing board of a century-old community chapel ordered an inquiry after receiving repeated complaints about unsafe repairs and incomplete financial records. At the first meeting, the chairperson <strong>marshalled</strong> invoices, inspection reports, and witness statements into a coherent sequence. Two independent examiners worked in <strong> tandem </strong>: one reviewed the accounts, while the other inspected the building. Their method was deliberately systematic, for <strong> reticulate </strong> cracks across the plaster suggested that the structural damage was not isolated but had spread like a network. <br><br> The administrative manager, who had already been <strong> demoted </strong> for neglecting maintenance duties, appeared in formal <strong> attire </strong> and stood near the <strong> pulpit </strong> while answering questions. However, his orderly appearance concealed considerable uncertainty. When asked whether the money reserved for drainage repairs had been properly used, he began to <strong> waffle </strong>, alternating between incomplete explanations and requests for additional time. <br><br> As the questioning continued, a <strong> nauseating </strong> smell from a blocked drain entered the hall. The manager became <strong> snappish </strong> with the examiners and later sat <strong> sulky </strong> and silent when reminded that the same defect had been reported several months earlier. <br><br> The board did not treat the manager’s temperament as conclusive proof of misconduct. Instead, it carefully distinguished personal conduct from documentary evidence. The inspectors’ records showed that invoices had been filed, but several repair entries lacked adequate supporting details. The board consequently postponed its final judgment, directed the examiners to verify every disputed payment, and required the manager to submit a precise written account. The episode demonstrated that organized evidence can restrain both hasty accusation and evasive defence: neither polished attire nor an irritable response can substitute for verifiable facts.
Which word is the most appropriate antonym of snappish in the context of the passage?
Explanation: Snappish describes the manager’s sharp and irritable behaviour, whereas amiable means friendly and pleasant and is therefore the appropriate antonym. Testy, peevish, and curt all suggest irritation, impatience, or abruptness and are close to the contextual meaning of snappish.
DIRECTIONS: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions. <br><br><br> The governing board of a century-old community chapel ordered an inquiry after receiving repeated complaints about unsafe repairs and incomplete financial records. At the first meeting, the chairperson <strong>marshalled</strong> invoices, inspection reports, and witness statements into a coherent sequence. Two independent examiners worked in <strong> tandem </strong>: one reviewed the accounts, while the other inspected the building. Their method was deliberately systematic, for <strong> reticulate </strong> cracks across the plaster suggested that the structural damage was not isolated but had spread like a network. <br><br> The administrative manager, who had already been <strong> demoted </strong> for neglecting maintenance duties, appeared in formal <strong> attire </strong> and stood near the <strong> pulpit </strong> while answering questions. However, his orderly appearance concealed considerable uncertainty. When asked whether the money reserved for drainage repairs had been properly used, he began to <strong> waffle </strong>, alternating between incomplete explanations and requests for additional time. <br><br> As the questioning continued, a <strong> nauseating </strong> smell from a blocked drain entered the hall. The manager became <strong> snappish </strong> with the examiners and later sat <strong> sulky </strong> and silent when reminded that the same defect had been reported several months earlier. <br><br> The board did not treat the manager’s temperament as conclusive proof of misconduct. Instead, it carefully distinguished personal conduct from documentary evidence. The inspectors’ records showed that invoices had been filed, but several repair entries lacked adequate supporting details. The board consequently postponed its final judgment, directed the examiners to verify every disputed payment, and required the manager to submit a precise written account. The episode demonstrated that organized evidence can restrain both hasty accusation and evasive defence: neither polished attire nor an irritable response can substitute for verifiable facts.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
Explanation: The passage states that the examiners worked in tandem and that the board later directed them to verify every disputed payment. The manager did not immediately provide a precise account, the cracks were reticulate rather than linear and isolated, and formal attire was explicitly rejected as a substitute for verifiable evidence.
DIRECTIONS: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions. <br><br><br> The governing board of a century-old community chapel ordered an inquiry after receiving repeated complaints about unsafe repairs and incomplete financial records. At the first meeting, the chairperson <strong>marshalled</strong> invoices, inspection reports, and witness statements into a coherent sequence. Two independent examiners worked in <strong> tandem </strong>: one reviewed the accounts, while the other inspected the building. Their method was deliberately systematic, for <strong> reticulate </strong> cracks across the plaster suggested that the structural damage was not isolated but had spread like a network. <br><br> The administrative manager, who had already been <strong> demoted </strong> for neglecting maintenance duties, appeared in formal <strong> attire </strong> and stood near the <strong> pulpit </strong> while answering questions. However, his orderly appearance concealed considerable uncertainty. When asked whether the money reserved for drainage repairs had been properly used, he began to <strong> waffle </strong>, alternating between incomplete explanations and requests for additional time. <br><br> As the questioning continued, a <strong> nauseating </strong> smell from a blocked drain entered the hall. The manager became <strong> snappish </strong> with the examiners and later sat <strong> sulky </strong> and silent when reminded that the same defect had been reported several months earlier. <br><br> The board did not treat the manager’s temperament as conclusive proof of misconduct. Instead, it carefully distinguished personal conduct from documentary evidence. The inspectors’ records showed that invoices had been filed, but several repair entries lacked adequate supporting details. The board consequently postponed its final judgment, directed the examiners to verify every disputed payment, and required the manager to submit a precise written account. The episode demonstrated that organized evidence can restrain both hasty accusation and evasive defence: neither polished attire nor an irritable response can substitute for verifiable facts.
Why did the board postpone its final judgment?
Explanation: The board postponed its judgment because several repair entries did not contain adequate supporting information, making further verification necessary. The unpleasant smell did not terminate the inquiry, the pulpit was unrelated to the decision, and the manager had appeared in formal attire, so the other alternatives are inconsistent with the passage.
30 questions in 15 minutes, All India rank, streak and explanations. Free: play it here after logging in, or in the app.
Free. Mobile number + OTP, no password.
