This is the Vocab24 daily quiz of 16 December 2025, the same 26 questions the app served that day, on the day's vocabulary and editorial. One mark for a right answer, minus 0.25 for a wrong one; the explanation opens as soon as you tap.
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Circumvent
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Antithesis
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Capacious
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Irrefutable
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Transpire
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Eradicate
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Inconsequential
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Rebuttal
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
A person or thing that is the direct opposite of someone or something; a contrast.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
Having a lot of space inside; roomy; able to hold a lot.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
Destroy completely; remove or wipe out (especially something harmful).
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
A response that argues against a claim, accusation, or evidence; a counter-argument.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
There was a time when I ____ stay up very late.
Explanation: 'could' is the right modal verb to use as past ability is talked about in the sentence.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
Arif is standing ____ Samad and Adnan.
Explanation: There are a few different ways 'among' and 'between' are used. The most common use for 'among' is when something is in or with a group of a few, several, or many things. The most common use of 'between' is when something is in the middle of two things or two groups of things. It is sometimes used in the phrase in between.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
Salman Khan ____ a part of the upcoming Race 4.
Explanation: In English grammar, the placement of adverbs is important for maintaining proper syntax and clarity. In this sentence, the adverb also modifies the verb phrase will be, indicating that Salman Khan will be participating in the upcoming Race 4 in addition to something else. The correct placement of also is before the main verb will be. Therefore, Option A: will also be is the correct choice. <br> Options B and C are incorrect because they place also between will and be, disrupting the correct word order. <br> Option D is incorrect because it only places also after will, which also disrupts the correct word order.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
To break the ice
Explanation: To break the ice: do or say something to relieve tension or get conversation going in a strained situation or when strangers meet.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
To be in two minds
Explanation: To be in two minds: be unable to decide between alternatives.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
Get down to brass tacks
Explanation: Get down to brass tacks: start to consider the basic facts or practical details.
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
Entering the crowding room (a)/ I could see not one person (b)/ whom I knew (c)/ No error (d
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
The lady approached me timidly (a)/ and trembling slightly (b)/ she sat down besides me (c)/ No error (d)
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
Whom did you intend to (a)/ invite to your party (b)/ beside my wife and me (c)/ No error (d)
Directions: Read the passage and answer the questions that follow: <br><br><br> Over the last few days, Delhi residents have been protesting against the government’s approval for felling over 14,000 trees in south Delhi. Faced with severe criticism, the National Buildings Construction Corporation, tasked with redeveloping half a dozen south Delhi colonies, on Monday assured the Delhi High Court that no trees would be cut for the project till July 4, which is temporary relief. Many of the trees proposed to be felled are mature, local, fruit-bearing ones that provide clean air, shade and water recharge to humans and are homes to many birds. These areas of Delhi have served as the “lungs” of the city. However, the project reports overlook these qualities. <br> Large constructions have been difficult to manage in India. The sector has systematically lobbied to be excluded from the environmental norms of the country and has been successful in carving out special privileges for itself in the environment clearance process. From 2006, most construction projects have been approved based on an application form instead of detailed assessment reports. In 2014, schools, colleges and hostels for educational institutions were exempted from taking environment clearances as long as they followed specific sustainability parameters. In 2016, projects with areas of less than 20,000 sq m were permitted to proceed as long as they submitted a self-declaration ensuring adherence to environmental norms. As a result of these privileges, construction projects contribute significantly to urban air and noise pollution and high water consumption in cities. Compensatory afforestation taken up in lieu of trees felled by projects is a failure due to poor survival rates of saplings and no monitoring. Yet all regulatory bodies treat large constructions with kid gloves. <br> The Minister for Urban Development has stated that this public campaign is “misinformed”. But that is far from the truth. In a literate, urban society that has high access to the Internet, the lack of official information on urban development and its impacts can only be understood as an indirect form of public silencing. There are no public hearings held for urban construction projects, and governments assume that citizens have nothing to say about them. Since Delhi is ruled by so many agencies, you can run from pillar to post and still not have a clue about who is in charge of what. The residents are now appealing to the government to embrace inclusive ways of redesigning the city. The governments could join hands by committing to review these projects.
Which of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim that compensatory afforestation has been a failure? <br><br> I. Saplings planted have a poor survival rate. <br> II. There is inadequate monitoring of the afforestation done. <br> III. The funds provided are adequate to cover the areas as well as look after them.
Explanation: Statement III is opposite of what is needed. <br> Statements I and II are correct and indicate towards reasons for compensatory afforestation failing. <br> Hence, option C is correct.
Directions: Read the passage and answer the questions that follow: <br><br><br> Over the last few days, Delhi residents have been protesting against the government’s approval for felling over 14,000 trees in south Delhi. Faced with severe criticism, the National Buildings Construction Corporation, tasked with redeveloping half a dozen south Delhi colonies, on Monday assured the Delhi High Court that no trees would be cut for the project till July 4, which is temporary relief. Many of the trees proposed to be felled are mature, local, fruit-bearing ones that provide clean air, shade and water recharge to humans and are homes to many birds. These areas of Delhi have served as the “lungs” of the city. However, the project reports overlook these qualities. <br> Large constructions have been difficult to manage in India. The sector has systematically lobbied to be excluded from the environmental norms of the country and has been successful in carving out special privileges for itself in the environment clearance process. From 2006, most construction projects have been approved based on an application form instead of detailed assessment reports. In 2014, schools, colleges and hostels for educational institutions were exempted from taking environment clearances as long as they followed specific sustainability parameters. In 2016, projects with areas of less than 20,000 sq m were permitted to proceed as long as they submitted a self-declaration ensuring adherence to environmental norms. As a result of these privileges, construction projects contribute significantly to urban air and noise pollution and high water consumption in cities. Compensatory afforestation taken up in lieu of trees felled by projects is a failure due to poor survival rates of saplings and no monitoring. Yet all regulatory bodies treat large constructions with kid gloves. <br> The Minister for Urban Development has stated that this public campaign is “misinformed”. But that is far from the truth. In a literate, urban society that has high access to the Internet, the lack of official information on urban development and its impacts can only be understood as an indirect form of public silencing. There are no public hearings held for urban construction projects, and governments assume that citizens have nothing to say about them. Since Delhi is ruled by so many agencies, you can run from pillar to post and still not have a clue about who is in charge of what. The residents are now appealing to the government to embrace inclusive ways of redesigning the city. The governments could join hands by committing to review these projects.
Which of the following statements, if true, strengthen the claim that the large construction sector has managed to get itself special privileges when it comes to environmental norms of the country? <br><br> I. The projects were designed by the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs and approved by the Union Cabinet in 2017. <br> II. The projects have been declared “smart” and “green” despite their ecological impacts such as high water usage and tree loss. <br> III. About 5 projects have been given environment clearances after they were cleared by the National Green Tribunal.
Explanation: Statement I is incorrect as it merely mentions who designed and approved the projects. <br> Statement III is incorrect as it shows that the projects were given clearance by a tribunal and does not indicate any foul play. <br> Statement II is correct clearly. <br> Hence, option B is correct.
Directions: Read the passage and answer the questions that follow: <br><br><br> Over the last few days, Delhi residents have been protesting against the government’s approval for felling over 14,000 trees in south Delhi. Faced with severe criticism, the National Buildings Construction Corporation, tasked with redeveloping half a dozen south Delhi colonies, on Monday assured the Delhi High Court that no trees would be cut for the project till July 4, which is temporary relief. Many of the trees proposed to be felled are mature, local, fruit-bearing ones that provide clean air, shade and water recharge to humans and are homes to many birds. These areas of Delhi have served as the “lungs” of the city. However, the project reports overlook these qualities. <br> Large constructions have been difficult to manage in India. The sector has systematically lobbied to be excluded from the environmental norms of the country and has been successful in carving out special privileges for itself in the environment clearance process. From 2006, most construction projects have been approved based on an application form instead of detailed assessment reports. In 2014, schools, colleges and hostels for educational institutions were exempted from taking environment clearances as long as they followed specific sustainability parameters. In 2016, projects with areas of less than 20,000 sq m were permitted to proceed as long as they submitted a self-declaration ensuring adherence to environmental norms. As a result of these privileges, construction projects contribute significantly to urban air and noise pollution and high water consumption in cities. Compensatory afforestation taken up in lieu of trees felled by projects is a failure due to poor survival rates of saplings and no monitoring. Yet all regulatory bodies treat large constructions with kid gloves. <br> The Minister for Urban Development has stated that this public campaign is “misinformed”. But that is far from the truth. In a literate, urban society that has high access to the Internet, the lack of official information on urban development and its impacts can only be understood as an indirect form of public silencing. There are no public hearings held for urban construction projects, and governments assume that citizens have nothing to say about them. Since Delhi is ruled by so many agencies, you can run from pillar to post and still not have a clue about who is in charge of what. The residents are now appealing to the government to embrace inclusive ways of redesigning the city. The governments could join hands by committing to review these projects.
What is meant by the phrase- ‘indirect form of public silencing’? <br><br> I. Lack of open access to the internet. <br> II. Lack of official information on development related issues. <br> III. Actively misinforming the public with blatant lies and false reports.
Explanation: Refer to: ‘. In a literate, urban society that has high access to the Internet, the lack of official information on urban development and its impacts can only be understood as an indirect form of public silencing.’ <br> I is opposite to what is in the passage while III has not been mentioned anywhere. <br> II is correct as can be seen from the highlighted fragment. <br> Hence, option C is correct.
Directions: Read the passage and answer the questions that follow: <br><br><br> Over the last few days, Delhi residents have been protesting against the government’s approval for felling over 14,000 trees in south Delhi. Faced with severe criticism, the National Buildings Construction Corporation, tasked with redeveloping half a dozen south Delhi colonies, on Monday assured the Delhi High Court that no trees would be cut for the project till July 4, which is temporary relief. Many of the trees proposed to be felled are mature, local, fruit-bearing ones that provide clean air, shade and water recharge to humans and are homes to many birds. These areas of Delhi have served as the “lungs” of the city. However, the project reports overlook these qualities. <br> Large constructions have been difficult to manage in India. The sector has systematically lobbied to be excluded from the environmental norms of the country and has been successful in carving out special privileges for itself in the environment clearance process. From 2006, most construction projects have been approved based on an application form instead of detailed assessment reports. In 2014, schools, colleges and hostels for educational institutions were exempted from taking environment clearances as long as they followed specific sustainability parameters. In 2016, projects with areas of less than 20,000 sq m were permitted to proceed as long as they submitted a self-declaration ensuring adherence to environmental norms. As a result of these privileges, construction projects contribute significantly to urban air and noise pollution and high water consumption in cities. Compensatory afforestation taken up in lieu of trees felled by projects is a failure due to poor survival rates of saplings and no monitoring. Yet all regulatory bodies treat large constructions with kid gloves. <br> The Minister for Urban Development has stated that this public campaign is “misinformed”. But that is far from the truth. In a literate, urban society that has high access to the Internet, the lack of official information on urban development and its impacts can only be understood as an indirect form of public silencing. There are no public hearings held for urban construction projects, and governments assume that citizens have nothing to say about them. Since Delhi is ruled by so many agencies, you can run from pillar to post and still not have a clue about who is in charge of what. The residents are now appealing to the government to embrace inclusive ways of redesigning the city. The governments could join hands by committing to review these projects.
What qualities are being discussed in the line- ‘However, the project reports overlook these qualities’?
Explanation: Refer to: ‘Many of the trees proposed to be felled are mature, local, fruit-bearing ones that provide clean air, shade and water recharge to humans and are homes to many birds. These areas of Delhi have served as the “lungs” of the city. However, the project reports overlook these qualities.’ <br> As per the highlighted fragment, these qualities pertain to the important place that trees hold in our environment. <br> Hence, option D is correct.
Directions: Read the passage and answer the questions that follow: <br><br><br> Over the last few days, Delhi residents have been protesting against the government’s approval for felling over 14,000 trees in south Delhi. Faced with severe criticism, the National Buildings Construction Corporation, tasked with redeveloping half a dozen south Delhi colonies, on Monday assured the Delhi High Court that no trees would be cut for the project till July 4, which is temporary relief. Many of the trees proposed to be felled are mature, local, fruit-bearing ones that provide clean air, shade and water recharge to humans and are homes to many birds. These areas of Delhi have served as the “lungs” of the city. However, the project reports overlook these qualities. <br> Large constructions have been difficult to manage in India. The sector has systematically lobbied to be excluded from the environmental norms of the country and has been successful in carving out special privileges for itself in the environment clearance process. From 2006, most construction projects have been approved based on an application form instead of detailed assessment reports. In 2014, schools, colleges and hostels for educational institutions were exempted from taking environment clearances as long as they followed specific sustainability parameters. In 2016, projects with areas of less than 20,000 sq m were permitted to proceed as long as they submitted a self-declaration ensuring adherence to environmental norms. As a result of these privileges, construction projects contribute significantly to urban air and noise pollution and high water consumption in cities. Compensatory afforestation taken up in lieu of trees felled by projects is a failure due to poor survival rates of saplings and no monitoring. Yet all regulatory bodies treat large constructions with kid gloves. <br> The Minister for Urban Development has stated that this public campaign is “misinformed”. But that is far from the truth. In a literate, urban society that has high access to the Internet, the lack of official information on urban development and its impacts can only be understood as an indirect form of public silencing. There are no public hearings held for urban construction projects, and governments assume that citizens have nothing to say about them. Since Delhi is ruled by so many agencies, you can run from pillar to post and still not have a clue about who is in charge of what. The residents are now appealing to the government to embrace inclusive ways of redesigning the city. The governments could join hands by committing to review these projects.
Which of the following is/are true as per the passage? <br><br> I. The project mentioned has been postponed indefinitely after public protests. <br> II. From 2006, most construction projects have been approved based on an application form instead of detailed assessment reports. <br> III. Multiple agencies in charge can create a lot of confusion.
Explanation: Refer to: ‘ The National Buildings Construction Corporation, tasked with redeveloping half a dozen south Delhi colonies, on Monday assured the Delhi High Court that no trees would be cut for the project till July 4, which is temporary relief.’ <br> I is incorrect. <br> ‘From 2006, most construction projects have been approved based on an application form instead of detailed assessment reports. In 2014, schools, colleges and hostels for educational institutions were exempted from taking environment clearances as long as they followed specific sustainability parameters.’ <br> II is correct. <br> ‘Since Delhi is ruled by so many agencies, you can run from pillar to post and still not have a clue about who is in charge of what.’ <br> III is correct. <br> Hence, option D is correct.
30 questions in 15 minutes, All India rank, streak and explanations. Free: play it here after logging in, or in the app.
Free. Mobile number + OTP, no password.
