This is the Vocab24 daily quiz of 6 December 2025, the same 26 questions the app served that day, on the day's vocabulary and editorial. One mark for a right answer, minus 0.25 for a wrong one; the explanation opens as soon as you tap.
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Lofty
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Zenith
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Burgeoning
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Raucous
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Knack
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Skirmish
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Stigma
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Parlance
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
Of imposing height; noble, elevated, or grand in character or ideals.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
Making or involving a loud, harsh, and unpleasant noise; noisy and disorderly.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
A mark of shame or disapproval that affects a person’s reputation; strong social disapproval of something.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
A very unpleasant, difficult, or painful experience, especially one that lasts for a long time.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
There are ____ than sixty boys in the class.
Explanation: You use 'no less/no lesser than' before an amount to indicate that the amount is surprisingly large.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
____ Salman had married in time, his kids would have been adult till now.
Explanation: You use if in conditional sentences to introduce the circumstances in which an event or situation might happen, might be happening, or might have happened.<br> Example: She gets very upset if I exclude her.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
I suspect him ____ stealing the pen?
Explanation: Option B is the correct answer because 'of' is used to mean concerning or relating to.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
To carry off the bell
Explanation: To carry off the bell: to succeed in doing or achieving something.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
To take the wind out of another's sails
Explanation: To take the wind out of another's sails: to cause someone to lose confidence or energy.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
A baker's dozen
Explanation: A baker's dozen: from the former bakers' custom of adding an extra loaf to a dozen sold.
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
If you saw the number of packets he consumed (a)/ at the breakfast this morning, (b)/ you would have understood why he is so overweight. (c)/ No error
Explanation: (a) If you had seen
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
He failed in (a)/ he (b)/ attempted(c)/ No Error (d)
Explanation: (b) what he
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
Why should I (a)/ suspected (b)/ by you (c)/ No Error (d)
Explanation: (b) be suspected
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below. <br><br><br> Paragraph 1: While there is general acceptance that the Indian judicial system suffers from case delay and the use of antiquated methods, the discourse on judicial reform remains focussed on areas such as appointments and vacancies. It is time that organisational barriers and court processes that also contribute to case delay are studied. We focus on two areas that greatly affect court efficiency: case listing practices and court infrastructure. <br> Paragraph 2: The need to scientifically determine how many cases should be listed per day cannot be stressed enough. It is not uncommon to see over 100 matters listed before a judge in a day. When a judge is pressed for time, not only does the quality of adjudication suffer but it also means that several cases will inevitably go unheard. Matters listed towards the end (usually cases near the final stage of hearing) tend to be left over at disproportionate rates and often end up getting stuck in the system. <br> Paragraph 3: The second issue is infrastructure: from inadequate support staff for judges to the dearth of basic courtroom facilities. Without research and secretarial support, judges are unable to perform their functions in a timely manner. For instance, in a private interview, a judge said that even though he managed to hear close to 70 cases in a day, it took two days for the stenographers to finish typing the orders. A 2016 report published by the Supreme Court showed that existing infrastructure could accommodate only 15,540 judicial officers against the all-India sanctioned strength of 20,558. The lack of infrastructure also raises serious concerns about access to justice. A recent Vidhi study on district courts in the National Capital Region found that even basic needs such as drinking water, usable washrooms, seating and canteen facilities are often not available in court complexes. Solutions for such challenges will require a fundamental shift in how courts are administered. <br> Paragraph 4: Courts must become more open to applying management principles to optimise case movement and judicial time. In this, external support agencies competent in strategic thinking should be allowed to work with judicial officers to understand and help the institution function better. This is already a widely-adopted practice in executive departments across the country. Courts have partially realised this need and created dedicated posts for court managers (MBA graduates) to help improve court operations. But more often than not, court managers are not utilised to their full potential, with their duties restricted to organising court events and running errands.
Which of the following is/are true as per the passage? <br><br> I. The existing court infrastructure is adequate for the current sanctioned strength at all-India levels. <br> II. It is not uncommon to see over 100 matters listed before a judge in a day. <br> III. The Indian Judiciary needs to be modernized.
Explanation: Refer to:<br> ‘A 2016 report published by the Supreme Court showed that existing infrastructure could accommodate only 15,540 judicial officers against the all-India sanctioned strength of 20,558.’ <br> I is incorrect. <br> ‘The need to scientifically determine how many cases should be listed per day cannot be stressed enough. It is not uncommon to see over 100 matters listed before a judge in a day.’ <br> II is correct. <br> The entire passage corroborates statement III and is correct. <br> Only II and III are correct. <br> Hence, option B is correct.
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below. <br><br><br> Paragraph 1: While there is general acceptance that the Indian judicial system suffers from case delay and the use of antiquated methods, the discourse on judicial reform remains focussed on areas such as appointments and vacancies. It is time that organisational barriers and court processes that also contribute to case delay are studied. We focus on two areas that greatly affect court efficiency: case listing practices and court infrastructure. <br> Paragraph 2: The need to scientifically determine how many cases should be listed per day cannot be stressed enough. It is not uncommon to see over 100 matters listed before a judge in a day. When a judge is pressed for time, not only does the quality of adjudication suffer but it also means that several cases will inevitably go unheard. Matters listed towards the end (usually cases near the final stage of hearing) tend to be left over at disproportionate rates and often end up getting stuck in the system. <br> Paragraph 3: The second issue is infrastructure: from inadequate support staff for judges to the dearth of basic courtroom facilities. Without research and secretarial support, judges are unable to perform their functions in a timely manner. For instance, in a private interview, a judge said that even though he managed to hear close to 70 cases in a day, it took two days for the stenographers to finish typing the orders. A 2016 report published by the Supreme Court showed that existing infrastructure could accommodate only 15,540 judicial officers against the all-India sanctioned strength of 20,558. The lack of infrastructure also raises serious concerns about access to justice. A recent Vidhi study on district courts in the National Capital Region found that even basic needs such as drinking water, usable washrooms, seating and canteen facilities are often not available in court complexes. Solutions for such challenges will require a fundamental shift in how courts are administered. <br> Paragraph 4: Courts must become more open to applying management principles to optimise case movement and judicial time. In this, external support agencies competent in strategic thinking should be allowed to work with judicial officers to understand and help the institution function better. This is already a widely-adopted practice in executive departments across the country. Courts have partially realised this need and created dedicated posts for court managers (MBA graduates) to help improve court operations. But more often than not, court managers are not utilised to their full potential, with their duties restricted to organising court events and running errands.
As per paragraph 1, which among the following are the focus areas of judicial reforms? <br><br> I. Framework for filling vacancies<br> II. Case Listing procedure <br> III. Infrastructure of courts
Explanation: Refer to: ‘, the discourse on judicial reform remains focussed on areas such as appointments and vacancies.’ <br> As per the statement above, only I is correct. The other two are areas where there should be more focus. <br> Hence, option C is correct.
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below. <br><br><br> Paragraph 1: While there is general acceptance that the Indian judicial system suffers from case delay and the use of antiquated methods, the discourse on judicial reform remains focussed on areas such as appointments and vacancies. It is time that organisational barriers and court processes that also contribute to case delay are studied. We focus on two areas that greatly affect court efficiency: case listing practices and court infrastructure. <br> Paragraph 2: The need to scientifically determine how many cases should be listed per day cannot be stressed enough. It is not uncommon to see over 100 matters listed before a judge in a day. When a judge is pressed for time, not only does the quality of adjudication suffer but it also means that several cases will inevitably go unheard. Matters listed towards the end (usually cases near the final stage of hearing) tend to be left over at disproportionate rates and often end up getting stuck in the system. <br> Paragraph 3: The second issue is infrastructure: from inadequate support staff for judges to the dearth of basic courtroom facilities. Without research and secretarial support, judges are unable to perform their functions in a timely manner. For instance, in a private interview, a judge said that even though he managed to hear close to 70 cases in a day, it took two days for the stenographers to finish typing the orders. A 2016 report published by the Supreme Court showed that existing infrastructure could accommodate only 15,540 judicial officers against the all-India sanctioned strength of 20,558. The lack of infrastructure also raises serious concerns about access to justice. A recent Vidhi study on district courts in the National Capital Region found that even basic needs such as drinking water, usable washrooms, seating and canteen facilities are often not available in court complexes. Solutions for such challenges will require a fundamental shift in how courts are administered. <br> Paragraph 4: Courts must become more open to applying management principles to optimise case movement and judicial time. In this, external support agencies competent in strategic thinking should be allowed to work with judicial officers to understand and help the institution function better. This is already a widely-adopted practice in executive departments across the country. Courts have partially realised this need and created dedicated posts for court managers (MBA graduates) to help improve court operations. But more often than not, court managers are not utilised to their full potential, with their duties restricted to organising court events and running errands.
What could be some possible consequences of the issues mentioned in paragraph 2? <br><br> I. There is uncertainty about when the cases would come up for hearing next and hampers the efficacy of lawyers in preparing for their cases in a better manner. <br> II. There is a better chance of winning the case in case of frequent changes in the hearing dates. <br> III. Frequent re-listing impacts the efficiency of the court administrative staff.
Explanation: I is correct. The uncertainty around which cases will come up for hearing means neither judges nor lawyers can plan their preparation and this also compels lawyers to waste time waiting in court. <br> III is correct as the administrative staff must manage the task of re-listing leftover matters in an already bulging docket, instead of streamlining case flow. <br> II is incorrect. There is no logic and guarantee that court cases would be won if there are frequent changes in hearing dates. <br> Hence, option D is correct.
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below. <br><br><br> Paragraph 1: While there is general acceptance that the Indian judicial system suffers from case delay and the use of antiquated methods, the discourse on judicial reform remains focussed on areas such as appointments and vacancies. It is time that organisational barriers and court processes that also contribute to case delay are studied. We focus on two areas that greatly affect court efficiency: case listing practices and court infrastructure. <br> Paragraph 2: The need to scientifically determine how many cases should be listed per day cannot be stressed enough. It is not uncommon to see over 100 matters listed before a judge in a day. When a judge is pressed for time, not only does the quality of adjudication suffer but it also means that several cases will inevitably go unheard. Matters listed towards the end (usually cases near the final stage of hearing) tend to be left over at disproportionate rates and often end up getting stuck in the system. <br> Paragraph 3: The second issue is infrastructure: from inadequate support staff for judges to the dearth of basic courtroom facilities. Without research and secretarial support, judges are unable to perform their functions in a timely manner. For instance, in a private interview, a judge said that even though he managed to hear close to 70 cases in a day, it took two days for the stenographers to finish typing the orders. A 2016 report published by the Supreme Court showed that existing infrastructure could accommodate only 15,540 judicial officers against the all-India sanctioned strength of 20,558. The lack of infrastructure also raises serious concerns about access to justice. A recent Vidhi study on district courts in the National Capital Region found that even basic needs such as drinking water, usable washrooms, seating and canteen facilities are often not available in court complexes. Solutions for such challenges will require a fundamental shift in how courts are administered. <br> Paragraph 4: Courts must become more open to applying management principles to optimise case movement and judicial time. In this, external support agencies competent in strategic thinking should be allowed to work with judicial officers to understand and help the institution function better. This is already a widely-adopted practice in executive departments across the country. Courts have partially realised this need and created dedicated posts for court managers (MBA graduates) to help improve court operations. But more often than not, court managers are not utilised to their full potential, with their duties restricted to organising court events and running errands.
Which of the following is an example of the statement in paragraph 3- ‘Without research and secretarial support, judges are unable to perform their functions in a timely manner.’?
Explanation: Option A is incorrect as here, the issue is not with the support staff but with the judge’s capabilities to hear adequate number of cases. <br> Options B and C are correct and showcase the issues with the Support Staff which hampers the judges from performing their tasks. <br> Hence, option E is correct.
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below. <br><br><br> Paragraph 1: While there is general acceptance that the Indian judicial system suffers from case delay and the use of antiquated methods, the discourse on judicial reform remains focussed on areas such as appointments and vacancies. It is time that organisational barriers and court processes that also contribute to case delay are studied. We focus on two areas that greatly affect court efficiency: case listing practices and court infrastructure. <br> Paragraph 2: The need to scientifically determine how many cases should be listed per day cannot be stressed enough. It is not uncommon to see over 100 matters listed before a judge in a day. When a judge is pressed for time, not only does the quality of adjudication suffer but it also means that several cases will inevitably go unheard. Matters listed towards the end (usually cases near the final stage of hearing) tend to be left over at disproportionate rates and often end up getting stuck in the system. <br> Paragraph 3: The second issue is infrastructure: from inadequate support staff for judges to the dearth of basic courtroom facilities. Without research and secretarial support, judges are unable to perform their functions in a timely manner. For instance, in a private interview, a judge said that even though he managed to hear close to 70 cases in a day, it took two days for the stenographers to finish typing the orders. A 2016 report published by the Supreme Court showed that existing infrastructure could accommodate only 15,540 judicial officers against the all-India sanctioned strength of 20,558. The lack of infrastructure also raises serious concerns about access to justice. A recent Vidhi study on district courts in the National Capital Region found that even basic needs such as drinking water, usable washrooms, seating and canteen facilities are often not available in court complexes. Solutions for such challenges will require a fundamental shift in how courts are administered. <br> Paragraph 4: Courts must become more open to applying management principles to optimise case movement and judicial time. In this, external support agencies competent in strategic thinking should be allowed to work with judicial officers to understand and help the institution function better. This is already a widely-adopted practice in executive departments across the country. Courts have partially realised this need and created dedicated posts for court managers (MBA graduates) to help improve court operations. But more often than not, court managers are not utilised to their full potential, with their duties restricted to organising court events and running errands.
After reading paragraph 4, what could be some other solutions to the problems mentioned in the passage? <br><br> I. Recording and analysing court-related data so as to prepare a database. <br> II. Digitization of court records with file-tracking and knowledge management systems. <br> III. Regular auditing of judicial infrastructure
Explanation: All of the statements mentioned convey points which can be used to improve the existing condition of the judiciary. <br> Hence, option E is correct.
30 questions in 15 minutes, All India rank, streak and explanations. Free: play it here after logging in, or in the app.
Free. Mobile number + OTP, no password.
