This is the Vocab24 daily quiz of 28 June 2025, the same 30 questions the app served that day, on the day's vocabulary and editorial. One mark for a right answer, minus 0.25 for a wrong one; the explanation opens as soon as you tap.
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Looming
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Circumstances
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Exile
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Repressive
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Seemed
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Expressed
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Specific
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Intensified
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
A fact or condition connected with or relevant to an event or action
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
The action of subduing someone or something by force.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
For a particular reason, purpose, etc.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
Famous or well known, typically for some bad quality or deed.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
____ he complains, the police will take action.
Explanation: If he complains, the police will take action.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
He has been seriously injured. There is ____ hope for his survival.
Explanation: Solution: <br> 1. The word 'little' is used to indicate a very small or negligible amount, often implying something is almost non-existent. <br> 2. In the given sentence, the context suggests that there is almost no hope for his survival, so 'little' is the correct choice. <br> 3. The other options do not fit the context appropriately: <br> - 'a little' means some amount, which would contradict the severity implied in the sentence. <br> - 'a few' and 'few' are used with countable nouns, while 'hope' is uncountable. <br> Thus, the correct sentence is: 'There is little hope for his survival.'
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
____ I come in, sir?
Explanation: Solution: 'May' is used when someone has to ask for something from someone because it sounds polite. <br> May I come in, sir?
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
There was a job for me to cut my teeth on.
Explanation: To cut my teeth on: To gain experience with something.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
The sworn enemies have decided to bury the hatchet.
Explanation: Bury the hatchet: end a quarrel or conflict and become friendly.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
Having sold off his factory, Mr. Roy is now a gentleman at large.
Explanation: Gentleman at large: an unreliable person.
Out of given alternatives select the word which is correctly spelt.
Choose the Correct Spelling.
Out of given alternatives select the word which is correctly spelt.
Choose the Correct Spelling.
Out of given alternatives select the word which is correctly spelt.
Choose the Correct Spelling.
Out of given alternatives select the word which is correctly spelt.
Choose the Correct Spelling.
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
I have just the memory (a)/ of my (b)/ father now (c)/ No error (d)
Explanation: No error
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
The company a ling time producer of planes (a)/ has engaged a public relation firm to inform (b)/ the public of their antipollution programme (c)/ No error (d)
Explanation: the public of its antipollution programme
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
How I wish it had been me (a)/ whom you had frightened (b)/ and not my daughter (c)/ No error (d)
Explanation: it had been I
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> Paragraph 1 : The government has announced a list of 'Institutes of Eminence' (IoE) among India's institutions of higher education. This was awaited for the simple reason that finding a place on it would save an educational institution from the clutches of a dreaded regulator. Regulators are meant to ensure that we have a socially desirable outcome, but in the case of higher education in India the opposite seems to have been the case. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has over half a century micro-managed this space to an unimaginable level of silliness. The result has been publicly funded universities that are cavernous wastes, shattering the aspirations of our youth and producing low-level 'knowledge'. Evidence of the role of India's higher-education regulator may be seen in the feature that the few instances when this is not the case the institutions have enjoyed privilege that leaves them protected from its depredations. <br><br> Paragraph 2 : The latest offering is in the form of a proposed Higher Education Commission of India (HECI). The intention is to leave the HECI to focus on quality while leaving funding of public institutions to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). Even as we observe the progress of the HECI and wonder if it is going to be any more than old wine in a new bottle, we have already have an inkling of what could go wrong. This springs from the government's announcement of a list of IoEs. The government has chosen three public and three private institutions for this status. The public institutions are the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and the Indian Institutes of Technology at Delhi and Mumbai. The private ones are the Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, the JIO Institute and the Manipal Academy of Higher Education. This list suffers from a serious lack of credibility. Where in it are the universities of India? We understand that the government's aim is to rectify the low presence of Indian institutions in the global rankings of universities. <br><br> Paragraph 3 : While the early European universities may have started as academies of the arts they were soon to have medicine and astronomy as areas that they pursued with vigour. Somewhere along the line we seem to have lost this breadth and come to revel in a landscape dominated by engineering schools. These engineering schools, notably the IITs, have done us proud but cannot be equated with the great universities of the world for the simple reason that they are focussed on a narrow domain. Also, if the idea behind IoEs is that they will be left alone and given enhanced financial support, it must be acknowledged that until very recently the IITs have not been meddled with neither have they been starved of resources. The IISc is of course broader than the IITs but does not embrace the social sciences and the humanities, the presence of which would be considered necessary for an university. <br><br> Paragraph 4 : If a list of eminent institutions in the country is at all needed, the absence of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) from the first list of IoEs is striking. Its faculty has brought many of the world's leading ideas to Indian students and in at least area came close to building a new school of thought, however controversial. It is not as if similar efforts in the social sciences have not occurred elsewhere in India but JNU has perhaps sustained its reputation as a university for longer. It already had schools of Computer Science and the Life Sciences over four decades ago when these were fledging disciplines giving it a certain breadth early on. <br><br> Paragraph 5 : Even as we may wonder at the exclusion of JNU from the list of IoEs released by the government one might wonder at how the private institutions that are on it made the cut. While BITS Pilani may have made a significant contribution to the country at a time when it desperately needed engineers, but is yet not what may be considered a university, the presence of the two others on the list leave one nonplussed. One of them, we are told, has been conferred the status on grounds of its promise, a dubious position to take as this institute has little to show except for the financial heft that will surely undergird it. The other is known largely for its association with the practice of charging capitation fees for education.
As per your understanding of the passage studied above, what can be some reasons for lack of quality in higher education? <br> I. State universities recruited a lot of faculty members on contract basis who have little incentive to perform. <br> II. Public universities are insulated from political pressure. <br> III. The amount spent on research is very less as compared to foreign Institutions. <br>
Explanation: Statement II is opposite of what is needed as this would improve quality in the Institutions. This is incorrect. Statements I and III are correct and give valid reasons for the lack of quality. Hence, option C is correct.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> Paragraph 1 : The government has announced a list of 'Institutes of Eminence' (IoE) among India's institutions of higher education. This was awaited for the simple reason that finding a place on it would save an educational institution from the clutches of a dreaded regulator. Regulators are meant to ensure that we have a socially desirable outcome, but in the case of higher education in India the opposite seems to have been the case. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has over half a century micro-managed this space to an unimaginable level of silliness. The result has been publicly funded universities that are cavernous wastes, shattering the aspirations of our youth and producing low-level 'knowledge'. Evidence of the role of India's higher-education regulator may be seen in the feature that the few instances when this is not the case the institutions have enjoyed privilege that leaves them protected from its depredations. <br><br> Paragraph 2 : The latest offering is in the form of a proposed Higher Education Commission of India (HECI). The intention is to leave the HECI to focus on quality while leaving funding of public institutions to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). Even as we observe the progress of the HECI and wonder if it is going to be any more than old wine in a new bottle, we have already have an inkling of what could go wrong. This springs from the government's announcement of a list of IoEs. The government has chosen three public and three private institutions for this status. The public institutions are the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and the Indian Institutes of Technology at Delhi and Mumbai. The private ones are the Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, the JIO Institute and the Manipal Academy of Higher Education. This list suffers from a serious lack of credibility. Where in it are the universities of India? We understand that the government's aim is to rectify the low presence of Indian institutions in the global rankings of universities. <br><br> Paragraph 3 : While the early European universities may have started as academies of the arts they were soon to have medicine and astronomy as areas that they pursued with vigour. Somewhere along the line we seem to have lost this breadth and come to revel in a landscape dominated by engineering schools. These engineering schools, notably the IITs, have done us proud but cannot be equated with the great universities of the world for the simple reason that they are focussed on a narrow domain. Also, if the idea behind IoEs is that they will be left alone and given enhanced financial support, it must be acknowledged that until very recently the IITs have not been meddled with neither have they been starved of resources. The IISc is of course broader than the IITs but does not embrace the social sciences and the humanities, the presence of which would be considered necessary for an university. <br><br> Paragraph 4 : If a list of eminent institutions in the country is at all needed, the absence of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) from the first list of IoEs is striking. Its faculty has brought many of the world's leading ideas to Indian students and in at least area came close to building a new school of thought, however controversial. It is not as if similar efforts in the social sciences have not occurred elsewhere in India but JNU has perhaps sustained its reputation as a university for longer. It already had schools of Computer Science and the Life Sciences over four decades ago when these were fledging disciplines giving it a certain breadth early on. <br><br> Paragraph 5 : Even as we may wonder at the exclusion of JNU from the list of IoEs released by the government one might wonder at how the private institutions that are on it made the cut. While BITS Pilani may have made a significant contribution to the country at a time when it desperately needed engineers, but is yet not what may be considered a university, the presence of the two others on the list leave one nonplussed. One of them, we are told, has been conferred the status on grounds of its promise, a dubious position to take as this institute has little to show except for the financial heft that will surely undergird it. The other is known largely for its association with the practice of charging capitation fees for education.
Which of the following is/are true as per the passage? <br> I. Among countries with a comparable research output, India with 0.8% R&D spending trails Russia, Brazil, South Korea and even Singapore, according to Unesco data. <br> II. HECI would focus on funding while quality would be regulated by the Ministry of Human Resource Development. <br> III. The Institution of Eminence (IoE) status has been given to six institutes, three each from the public and private sectors.
Explanation: I has not been mentioned anywhere and is incorrect. <br> 'The intention is to leave the HECI to focus on quality while leaving funding of public institutions to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD).' <br> II is incorrect. <br> 'This springs from the government's announcement of a list of IoEs. The government has chosen three public and three private institutions for this status. The public institutions are the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and the Indian Institutes of Technology at Delhi and Mumbai. The private ones are the Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, the JIO Institute and the Manipal Academy of Higher Education.' <br> III is correct. <br> Hence, option B is correct.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> Paragraph 1 : The government has announced a list of 'Institutes of Eminence' (IoE) among India's institutions of higher education. This was awaited for the simple reason that finding a place on it would save an educational institution from the clutches of a dreaded regulator. Regulators are meant to ensure that we have a socially desirable outcome, but in the case of higher education in India the opposite seems to have been the case. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has over half a century micro-managed this space to an unimaginable level of silliness. The result has been publicly funded universities that are cavernous wastes, shattering the aspirations of our youth and producing low-level 'knowledge'. Evidence of the role of India's higher-education regulator may be seen in the feature that the few instances when this is not the case the institutions have enjoyed privilege that leaves them protected from its depredations. <br><br> Paragraph 2 : The latest offering is in the form of a proposed Higher Education Commission of India (HECI). The intention is to leave the HECI to focus on quality while leaving funding of public institutions to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). Even as we observe the progress of the HECI and wonder if it is going to be any more than old wine in a new bottle, we have already have an inkling of what could go wrong. This springs from the government's announcement of a list of IoEs. The government has chosen three public and three private institutions for this status. The public institutions are the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and the Indian Institutes of Technology at Delhi and Mumbai. The private ones are the Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, the JIO Institute and the Manipal Academy of Higher Education. This list suffers from a serious lack of credibility. Where in it are the universities of India? We understand that the government's aim is to rectify the low presence of Indian institutions in the global rankings of universities. <br><br> Paragraph 3 : While the early European universities may have started as academies of the arts they were soon to have medicine and astronomy as areas that they pursued with vigour. Somewhere along the line we seem to have lost this breadth and come to revel in a landscape dominated by engineering schools. These engineering schools, notably the IITs, have done us proud but cannot be equated with the great universities of the world for the simple reason that they are focussed on a narrow domain. Also, if the idea behind IoEs is that they will be left alone and given enhanced financial support, it must be acknowledged that until very recently the IITs have not been meddled with neither have they been starved of resources. The IISc is of course broader than the IITs but does not embrace the social sciences and the humanities, the presence of which would be considered necessary for an university. <br><br> Paragraph 4 : If a list of eminent institutions in the country is at all needed, the absence of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) from the first list of IoEs is striking. Its faculty has brought many of the world's leading ideas to Indian students and in at least area came close to building a new school of thought, however controversial. It is not as if similar efforts in the social sciences have not occurred elsewhere in India but JNU has perhaps sustained its reputation as a university for longer. It already had schools of Computer Science and the Life Sciences over four decades ago when these were fledging disciplines giving it a certain breadth early on. <br><br> Paragraph 5 : Even as we may wonder at the exclusion of JNU from the list of IoEs released by the government one might wonder at how the private institutions that are on it made the cut. While BITS Pilani may have made a significant contribution to the country at a time when it desperately needed engineers, but is yet not what may be considered a university, the presence of the two others on the list leave one nonplussed. One of them, we are told, has been conferred the status on grounds of its promise, a dubious position to take as this institute has little to show except for the financial heft that will surely undergird it. The other is known largely for its association with the practice of charging capitation fees for education.
Which of the following best describes the tone of the author in paragraph 1?
Explanation: Euphoric: full of energy, excitement, and cheerfulness. <br> Castigating: reprimand/rebuke (someone) severely. <br> Deploring: feel or express strong condemnation of (something). <br> Lamenting: a passionate expression of grief or sorrow. <br> Now, if we read the paragraph we can see the author is criticizing the regulation of the education sector and elaborates on this in the entire paragraph. <br> Clearly, Option A can be eliminated quickly. <br> Option D can also be eliminated as the author is not sad or expressing grief but is angry. <br> Out of options B and C, C is a better choice as the author is not verbally scolding anyone (castigating) but is expressing disapproval and criticizing the heavy handedness of the government regulator in the education sector. Here, option C is a better fit. <br> Hence, option C is correct.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> Paragraph 1 : The government has announced a list of 'Institutes of Eminence' (IoE) among India's institutions of higher education. This was awaited for the simple reason that finding a place on it would save an educational institution from the clutches of a dreaded regulator. Regulators are meant to ensure that we have a socially desirable outcome, but in the case of higher education in India the opposite seems to have been the case. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has over half a century micro-managed this space to an unimaginable level of silliness. The result has been publicly funded universities that are cavernous wastes, shattering the aspirations of our youth and producing low-level 'knowledge'. Evidence of the role of India's higher-education regulator may be seen in the feature that the few instances when this is not the case the institutions have enjoyed privilege that leaves them protected from its depredations. <br><br> Paragraph 2 : The latest offering is in the form of a proposed Higher Education Commission of India (HECI). The intention is to leave the HECI to focus on quality while leaving funding of public institutions to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). Even as we observe the progress of the HECI and wonder if it is going to be any more than old wine in a new bottle, we have already have an inkling of what could go wrong. This springs from the government's announcement of a list of IoEs. The government has chosen three public and three private institutions for this status. The public institutions are the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and the Indian Institutes of Technology at Delhi and Mumbai. The private ones are the Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, the JIO Institute and the Manipal Academy of Higher Education. This list suffers from a serious lack of credibility. Where in it are the universities of India? We understand that the government's aim is to rectify the low presence of Indian institutions in the global rankings of universities. <br><br> Paragraph 3 : While the early European universities may have started as academies of the arts they were soon to have medicine and astronomy as areas that they pursued with vigour. Somewhere along the line we seem to have lost this breadth and come to revel in a landscape dominated by engineering schools. These engineering schools, notably the IITs, have done us proud but cannot be equated with the great universities of the world for the simple reason that they are focussed on a narrow domain. Also, if the idea behind IoEs is that they will be left alone and given enhanced financial support, it must be acknowledged that until very recently the IITs have not been meddled with neither have they been starved of resources. The IISc is of course broader than the IITs but does not embrace the social sciences and the humanities, the presence of which would be considered necessary for an university. <br><br> Paragraph 4 : If a list of eminent institutions in the country is at all needed, the absence of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) from the first list of IoEs is striking. Its faculty has brought many of the world's leading ideas to Indian students and in at least area came close to building a new school of thought, however controversial. It is not as if similar efforts in the social sciences have not occurred elsewhere in India but JNU has perhaps sustained its reputation as a university for longer. It already had schools of Computer Science and the Life Sciences over four decades ago when these were fledging disciplines giving it a certain breadth early on. <br><br> Paragraph 5 : Even as we may wonder at the exclusion of JNU from the list of IoEs released by the government one might wonder at how the private institutions that are on it made the cut. While BITS Pilani may have made a significant contribution to the country at a time when it desperately needed engineers, but is yet not what may be considered a university, the presence of the two others on the list leave one nonplussed. One of them, we are told, has been conferred the status on grounds of its promise, a dubious position to take as this institute has little to show except for the financial heft that will surely undergird it. The other is known largely for its association with the practice of charging capitation fees for education.
What could be a/some result/s of the function of funding of public institutions being left to the Ministry of Human Resource Development instead of HECI? <br> I. The government may use its discretion to reward institutions according to its ideological predilections. <br> II. The Institutions may be forced to comply with even some dubious rules setup by the government. <br> III. The government can be made accountable for attaining excellence in education.
Explanation: Statements I and II are correct. If it is upto the government, it may use its discretion to make the Institutions comply with their ideologies and rules. <br> Statement III is incorrect. The ministry/government would simply be looking after funding and not functioning of the sector. This cannot be concluded. Hence, option B is correct.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> Paragraph 1 : The government has announced a list of 'Institutes of Eminence' (IoE) among India's institutions of higher education. This was awaited for the simple reason that finding a place on it would save an educational institution from the clutches of a dreaded regulator. Regulators are meant to ensure that we have a socially desirable outcome, but in the case of higher education in India the opposite seems to have been the case. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has over half a century micro-managed this space to an unimaginable level of silliness. The result has been publicly funded universities that are cavernous wastes, shattering the aspirations of our youth and producing low-level 'knowledge'. Evidence of the role of India's higher-education regulator may be seen in the feature that the few instances when this is not the case the institutions have enjoyed privilege that leaves them protected from its depredations. <br><br> Paragraph 2 : The latest offering is in the form of a proposed Higher Education Commission of India (HECI). The intention is to leave the HECI to focus on quality while leaving funding of public institutions to the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). Even as we observe the progress of the HECI and wonder if it is going to be any more than old wine in a new bottle, we have already have an inkling of what could go wrong. This springs from the government's announcement of a list of IoEs. The government has chosen three public and three private institutions for this status. The public institutions are the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and the Indian Institutes of Technology at Delhi and Mumbai. The private ones are the Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, the JIO Institute and the Manipal Academy of Higher Education. This list suffers from a serious lack of credibility. Where in it are the universities of India? We understand that the government's aim is to rectify the low presence of Indian institutions in the global rankings of universities. <br><br> Paragraph 3 : While the early European universities may have started as academies of the arts they were soon to have medicine and astronomy as areas that they pursued with vigour. Somewhere along the line we seem to have lost this breadth and come to revel in a landscape dominated by engineering schools. These engineering schools, notably the IITs, have done us proud but cannot be equated with the great universities of the world for the simple reason that they are focussed on a narrow domain. Also, if the idea behind IoEs is that they will be left alone and given enhanced financial support, it must be acknowledged that until very recently the IITs have not been meddled with neither have they been starved of resources. The IISc is of course broader than the IITs but does not embrace the social sciences and the humanities, the presence of which would be considered necessary for an university. <br><br> Paragraph 4 : If a list of eminent institutions in the country is at all needed, the absence of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) from the first list of IoEs is striking. Its faculty has brought many of the world's leading ideas to Indian students and in at least area came close to building a new school of thought, however controversial. It is not as if similar efforts in the social sciences have not occurred elsewhere in India but JNU has perhaps sustained its reputation as a university for longer. It already had schools of Computer Science and the Life Sciences over four decades ago when these were fledging disciplines giving it a certain breadth early on. <br><br> Paragraph 5 : Even as we may wonder at the exclusion of JNU from the list of IoEs released by the government one might wonder at how the private institutions that are on it made the cut. While BITS Pilani may have made a significant contribution to the country at a time when it desperately needed engineers, but is yet not what may be considered a university, the presence of the two others on the list leave one nonplussed. One of them, we are told, has been conferred the status on grounds of its promise, a dubious position to take as this institute has little to show except for the financial heft that will surely undergird it. The other is known largely for its association with the practice of charging capitation fees for education.
Which of the following may be inferred from paragraph 3? <br> I. Universities should embody knowledge across a wide range of disciplines. <br> II. There is an emphasis on a depth of knowledge across a broad horizon in Indian Universities today. <br> III. In India, a lot of focus is given to Institutions which are focused on only few areas.
Explanation: Statement I is correct. The entire paragraph talks about how an ideal Institution should focus on a wide variety of disciplines. This can be inferred and is correct. <br> Statement II is the opposite of what the paragraph states and is incorrect. <br> Statement III is correct as can be seen from the examples of IITs and IISc. <br> Hence, option D is correct.
One Prime for the website and the app, same login. Videos play in the app.
30 questions in 15 minutes, All India rank, streak and explanations. Free: play it here after logging in, or in the app.
Free. Mobile number + OTP, no password.
