This is the Vocab24 daily quiz of 28 May 2025, the same 30 questions the app served that day, on the day's vocabulary and editorial. One mark for a right answer, minus 0.25 for a wrong one; the explanation opens as soon as you tap.
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Fatal
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Rapidly
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Eliminated
Out of the given alternatives select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of given word.
Affecting
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Drastically
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Strains
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Estimates
Out of the given alternatives select the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Refraining
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
The quality of being able to cause death or fatal disasters.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
To remove or take away someone or something.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
Force (a part of one's body or oneself) to make an unusually great effort.
Out of given alternatives, choose the word which can be substituted for the given words/ sentence.
Stop oneself from doing something.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
Girls have been teasing boys. 20 minutes.
Explanation: Past perfect continuous tense is used when a work is being continued for some time from the past. have been teasing is past perfect continuous and for is the correct preposition to be used.
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
God has been distributing wisdom among people ____ many years.
Explanation: God has been distributing wisdom among people for many years. <br> In this sentence, the word choice depends on the correct usage of prepositions with the verb 'distributing.' The verb 'distributing' is used to indicate an action that has been happening over a period of time. When describing a period of time in English, you should use the preposition 'for.' <br> So, the correct option is: Option B: for<br> It should be: 'God has been distributing wisdom among people for many years.'
A statement with one blank is given below. Choose the set of words from the given options which can be used to fill the given blank.
Hanuman ____ Ram too much.
Explanation: Sentence is in simple past tense. respected is the correct option.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
To all intent and purposes he is a good man.
Explanation: To all intent and purposes: in all important respects.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
Don't stick your neck out.
Explanation: stick your neck out: to take a risk.
Out of given alternatives select the option which best expresses the meaning of given idiom/ phrase.
At a party, he is always in high spirits.
Explanation: in high spirits: extremely happy and having a good time.
Out of given alternatives select the word which is correctly spelt.
Choose the Correct Spelling.
Out of given alternatives select the word which is correctly spelt.
Choose the Correct Spelling.
Out of given alternatives select the word which is correctly spelt.
Choose the Correct Spelling.
Out of given alternatives select the word which is correctly spelt.
Choose the Correct Spelling.
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
Two astronauts were disappointed because (a)/ they had hoped to have made (b)/ the first trip to moon (c)/ No error (d)
Explanation: to make
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
If you want me to express my opinion (a)/ I think that (b)/ Report A is equally as good as Report B (c)/ No error (d)
Explanation: omit equally
Which of phrases given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold type to make the grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is, mark 'd' as the answer.
He had a chance (a)/ to invest wisely, establish his position (b)/ and displaying his ability as an executive (c)/ No error (d)
Explanation: and display
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> The Reserve Bank of India's annual report for 2017-18 reveals that 99.3% of currency notes that were demonetised at midnight on November 8, 2016 have returned to the banking system. This is only marginally higher than its provisional estimate last year that over 99% - or Rs.15.28 lakh crore worth of the old Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 notes - out of the Rs.15.44 lakh crore that were in circulation at the time had been deposited by June 30, 2017. This makes a couple of things crystal clear. First, the hope that a large chunk of unaccounted money would not return to the system - arguably, the principal reason for the exercise - was almost wholly belied. As a result, the plan to transfer the arising surplus from the RBI to the Centre, which was not formally declared but strongly rumoured, was a non-starter. Second, given the sheer logistical difficulty in penalising all those who converted unaccounted money into legal tender, demonetisation worked as an unintended amnesty scheme. Despite the significant cost to the economy, demonetisation, to the disappointment of the Prime Minister's critics, had no political fallout. Narendra Modi succeeded in portraying the move as one that would knock out the corrupt rich - a harsh but necessary shock therapy. This was perhaps why the massive disruption caused by the overnight removal of 86% of the currency in value terms did not cause agitations. <br><br> Nevertheless, the RBI report, which points to a spurt in counterfeiting of the new Rs.500 and Rs.2,000 notes, raises the old question all over again. Was it worth the slowdown in growth, the damage to informal sector supply chains, and job losses in sectors such as construction that were the bulwark of employment creation for the unskilled? True, there have been some benefits. For instance, the number of income tax returns filed has surged a little over the trend growth rate. But surely this could have been achieved by other policy measures. Cashless modes of payment have become more common, but financial savings in the form of currency have also risen, suggesting that people still value cash. Not all policy choices work out and accepting mistakes or planning flaws helps strengthen governance processes. For example, learning from the UPA's mistakes, a cleaner auction process for natural resources has been worked out. The government must not disown its biggest reform attempt or try to sidestep parliamentary scrutiny of the outcomes of demonetisation. Instead, it could focus on fixing the problems that people still face - transactions with Rs.2,000 notes in the absence of Rs.1,000 notes are difficult as it is a departure from the currency denomination principle (every note should be twice or two and a half times its preceding denomination). Even as these issues are sorted out, the larger lesson must be heeded: sudden shocks to the economy don't always yield intended policy objectives.
Which among the following sums up the opinion of the author regarding the demonetization drive announced by the government?
Explanation: According to the passage, the move of the government regarding demonetization was a complete failure since the stated objective could not be met at the end of the day and actually most of the cash came back to the system. It was a total failure for the move intended to flush out black money from the country. <br> Among the given options, option A is not correct since it is not something that follows from the passage whereas the same can be said regarding options B and C. Coming to option D, it may sound true but there is no such reference in the passage that the author feels proper homework should be done by the government before launching any scheme of the magnitude of demonetization program. <br> This makes option E the correct choice among the given options
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> The Reserve Bank of India's annual report for 2017-18 reveals that 99.3% of currency notes that were demonetised at midnight on November 8, 2016 have returned to the banking system. This is only marginally higher than its provisional estimate last year that over 99% - or Rs.15.28 lakh crore worth of the old Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 notes - out of the Rs.15.44 lakh crore that were in circulation at the time had been deposited by June 30, 2017. This makes a couple of things crystal clear. First, the hope that a large chunk of unaccounted money would not return to the system - arguably, the principal reason for the exercise - was almost wholly belied. As a result, the plan to transfer the arising surplus from the RBI to the Centre, which was not formally declared but strongly rumoured, was a non-starter. Second, given the sheer logistical difficulty in penalising all those who converted unaccounted money into legal tender, demonetisation worked as an unintended amnesty scheme. Despite the significant cost to the economy, demonetisation, to the disappointment of the Prime Minister's critics, had no political fallout. Narendra Modi succeeded in portraying the move as one that would knock out the corrupt rich - a harsh but necessary shock therapy. This was perhaps why the massive disruption caused by the overnight removal of 86% of the currency in value terms did not cause agitations. <br><br> Nevertheless, the RBI report, which points to a spurt in counterfeiting of the new Rs.500 and Rs.2,000 notes, raises the old question all over again. Was it worth the slowdown in growth, the damage to informal sector supply chains, and job losses in sectors such as construction that were the bulwark of employment creation for the unskilled? True, there have been some benefits. For instance, the number of income tax returns filed has surged a little over the trend growth rate. But surely this could have been achieved by other policy measures. Cashless modes of payment have become more common, but financial savings in the form of currency have also risen, suggesting that people still value cash. Not all policy choices work out and accepting mistakes or planning flaws helps strengthen governance processes. For example, learning from the UPA's mistakes, a cleaner auction process for natural resources has been worked out. The government must not disown its biggest reform attempt or try to sidestep parliamentary scrutiny of the outcomes of demonetisation. Instead, it could focus on fixing the problems that people still face - transactions with Rs.2,000 notes in the absence of Rs.1,000 notes are difficult as it is a departure from the currency denomination principle (every note should be twice or two and a half times its preceding denomination). Even as these issues are sorted out, the larger lesson must be heeded: sudden shocks to the economy don't always yield intended policy objectives.
Which among the following should be the course of action of the government now that the demonetization has failed?
Explanation: Refer to, 'The government must not disown its biggest reform attempt or try to sidestep parliamentary scrutiny of the outcomes of demonetisation. <br> Instead, it could focus on fixing the problems that people still face - transactions with Rs 2,000 notes in the absence of Rs1,000 notes are difficult as it is a departure from the currency denomination principle.' <br> It is clear that the government should not disown its mistake in implementing demonetization in the country so that it can take the corrective measures to address the issues that the public still faces in the country with the new currency notes. <br> Among the given options, only option A can be considered as the correct since it correctly explains the correct course of action that should be followed by the government. Other options are out of context as per the information given in the passage and hence they can be eliminated. <br> This makes option A the correct choice among the given options.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> The Reserve Bank of India's annual report for 2017-18 reveals that 99.3% of currency notes that were demonetised at midnight on November 8, 2016 have returned to the banking system. This is only marginally higher than its provisional estimate last year that over 99% - or Rs.15.28 lakh crore worth of the old Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 notes - out of the Rs.15.44 lakh crore that were in circulation at the time had been deposited by June 30, 2017. This makes a couple of things crystal clear. First, the hope that a large chunk of unaccounted money would not return to the system - arguably, the principal reason for the exercise - was almost wholly belied. As a result, the plan to transfer the arising surplus from the RBI to the Centre, which was not formally declared but strongly rumoured, was a non-starter. Second, given the sheer logistical difficulty in penalising all those who converted unaccounted money into legal tender, demonetisation worked as an unintended amnesty scheme. Despite the significant cost to the economy, demonetisation, to the disappointment of the Prime Minister's critics, had no political fallout. Narendra Modi succeeded in portraying the move as one that would knock out the corrupt rich - a harsh but necessary shock therapy. This was perhaps why the massive disruption caused by the overnight removal of 86% of the currency in value terms did not cause agitations. <br><br> Nevertheless, the RBI report, which points to a spurt in counterfeiting of the new Rs.500 and Rs.2,000 notes, raises the old question all over again. Was it worth the slowdown in growth, the damage to informal sector supply chains, and job losses in sectors such as construction that were the bulwark of employment creation for the unskilled? True, there have been some benefits. For instance, the number of income tax returns filed has surged a little over the trend growth rate. But surely this could have been achieved by other policy measures. Cashless modes of payment have become more common, but financial savings in the form of currency have also risen, suggesting that people still value cash. Not all policy choices work out and accepting mistakes or planning flaws helps strengthen governance processes. For example, learning from the UPA's mistakes, a cleaner auction process for natural resources has been worked out. The government must not disown its biggest reform attempt or try to sidestep parliamentary scrutiny of the outcomes of demonetisation. Instead, it could focus on fixing the problems that people still face - transactions with Rs.2,000 notes in the absence of Rs.1,000 notes are difficult as it is a departure from the currency denomination principle (every note should be twice or two and a half times its preceding denomination). Even as these issues are sorted out, the larger lesson must be heeded: sudden shocks to the economy don't always yield intended policy objectives.
Which among the following can be considered as the takeaway from the incident described in the given passage?
Explanation: Refer to, 'Even as these issues are sorted out, the larger lesson must be heeded: sudden shocks to the economy don't always yield intended policy objectives.' <br> The summary of the passage is that the government may think that any sudden decision may yield intended policy objectives but it is not always true and it may also be the case that such policy decisions will affect the health of the economy more than contributing to its growth. <br> Among the given options, option E is the correct choice since it perfectly captures the essence of the passage and other options are not relevant as per the information given in the passage. <br> This makes option E the correct choice among the given options.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> The Reserve Bank of India's annual report for 2017-18 reveals that 99.3% of currency notes that were demonetised at midnight on November 8, 2016 have returned to the banking system. This is only marginally higher than its provisional estimate last year that over 99% - or Rs.15.28 lakh crore worth of the old Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 notes - out of the Rs.15.44 lakh crore that were in circulation at the time had been deposited by June 30, 2017. This makes a couple of things crystal clear. First, the hope that a large chunk of unaccounted money would not return to the system - arguably, the principal reason for the exercise - was almost wholly belied. As a result, the plan to transfer the arising surplus from the RBI to the Centre, which was not formally declared but strongly rumoured, was a non-starter. Second, given the sheer logistical difficulty in penalising all those who converted unaccounted money into legal tender, demonetisation worked as an unintended amnesty scheme. Despite the significant cost to the economy, demonetisation, to the disappointment of the Prime Minister's critics, had no political fallout. Narendra Modi succeeded in portraying the move as one that would knock out the corrupt rich - a harsh but necessary shock therapy. This was perhaps why the massive disruption caused by the overnight removal of 86% of the currency in value terms did not cause agitations. <br><br> Nevertheless, the RBI report, which points to a spurt in counterfeiting of the new Rs.500 and Rs.2,000 notes, raises the old question all over again. Was it worth the slowdown in growth, the damage to informal sector supply chains, and job losses in sectors such as construction that were the bulwark of employment creation for the unskilled? True, there have been some benefits. For instance, the number of income tax returns filed has surged a little over the trend growth rate. But surely this could have been achieved by other policy measures. Cashless modes of payment have become more common, but financial savings in the form of currency have also risen, suggesting that people still value cash. Not all policy choices work out and accepting mistakes or planning flaws helps strengthen governance processes. For example, learning from the UPA's mistakes, a cleaner auction process for natural resources has been worked out. The government must not disown its biggest reform attempt or try to sidestep parliamentary scrutiny of the outcomes of demonetisation. Instead, it could focus on fixing the problems that people still face - transactions with Rs.2,000 notes in the absence of Rs.1,000 notes are difficult as it is a departure from the currency denomination principle (every note should be twice or two and a half times its preceding denomination). Even as these issues are sorted out, the larger lesson must be heeded: sudden shocks to the economy don't always yield intended policy objectives.
Which among the following is correct regarding the positive effects of demonetization as discussed in the passage? <br> I. The number of income tax returns filed post demonetization has increased since now a lot of people are going to filing of income tax returns<br> II. The cashless mode of transactions has become more popular post demonetization since now people are resorting to cashless modes of transactions<br> III. The RBI has become more proactive these days in order to prevent money laundering activities in the country.
Explanation: Refer to, 'True, there have been some benefits. For instance, the number of income tax returns filed has surged a little over the trend growth rate. <br> But surely this could have been achieved by other policy measures. <br> Cashless modes of payment have become more common, but financial savings in the form of currency have also risen, suggesting that people still value cash.' <br> Statement I is correct since people are now more into filing of income tax returns in order to be on the safe side and also to prevent any wrong impression of the income tax department towards them. <br> Statement II is correct since the citizens are now resorting to the cashless modes of transactions but they still value cash based transactions. <br> Statement III is not correct since there is no reference in the passage that the RBI has become proactive post demonetization regarding detection of money laundering activities in the country. This can be eliminated. <br> This makes option B is the correct choice among the given options.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. <br><br> The Reserve Bank of India's annual report for 2017-18 reveals that 99.3% of currency notes that were demonetised at midnight on November 8, 2016 have returned to the banking system. This is only marginally higher than its provisional estimate last year that over 99% - or Rs.15.28 lakh crore worth of the old Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 notes - out of the Rs.15.44 lakh crore that were in circulation at the time had been deposited by June 30, 2017. This makes a couple of things crystal clear. First, the hope that a large chunk of unaccounted money would not return to the system - arguably, the principal reason for the exercise - was almost wholly belied. As a result, the plan to transfer the arising surplus from the RBI to the Centre, which was not formally declared but strongly rumoured, was a non-starter. Second, given the sheer logistical difficulty in penalising all those who converted unaccounted money into legal tender, demonetisation worked as an unintended amnesty scheme. Despite the significant cost to the economy, demonetisation, to the disappointment of the Prime Minister's critics, had no political fallout. Narendra Modi succeeded in portraying the move as one that would knock out the corrupt rich - a harsh but necessary shock therapy. This was perhaps why the massive disruption caused by the overnight removal of 86% of the currency in value terms did not cause agitations. <br><br> Nevertheless, the RBI report, which points to a spurt in counterfeiting of the new Rs.500 and Rs.2,000 notes, raises the old question all over again. Was it worth the slowdown in growth, the damage to informal sector supply chains, and job losses in sectors such as construction that were the bulwark of employment creation for the unskilled? True, there have been some benefits. For instance, the number of income tax returns filed has surged a little over the trend growth rate. But surely this could have been achieved by other policy measures. Cashless modes of payment have become more common, but financial savings in the form of currency have also risen, suggesting that people still value cash. Not all policy choices work out and accepting mistakes or planning flaws helps strengthen governance processes. For example, learning from the UPA's mistakes, a cleaner auction process for natural resources has been worked out. The government must not disown its biggest reform attempt or try to sidestep parliamentary scrutiny of the outcomes of demonetisation. Instead, it could focus on fixing the problems that people still face - transactions with Rs.2,000 notes in the absence of Rs.1,000 notes are difficult as it is a departure from the currency denomination principle (every note should be twice or two and a half times its preceding denomination). Even as these issues are sorted out, the larger lesson must be heeded: sudden shocks to the economy don't always yield intended policy objectives.
Which among the following is / are correct regarding the RBI Annual Report for the year 2017-18 as described in the passage?
Explanation: `Statement A is correct since it is mentioned in the passage that around 99.3% currency has come back into the banking system after the demonetization. This proves that the demonetization drive has failed completely in India. Refer to, 'The Reserve Bank of India's annual report for 2017-18 reveals that 99.3% of currency notes that were demonetised at midnight on November 8, 2016 have returned to the banking system. <br> This is only marginally higher than its provisional estimate last year that over 99% - or Rs 15.28 lakh crore worth of the old Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes - out of the Rs 15.44 lakh crore that were in circulation at the time had been deposited by June 30, 2017.' <br> Statement B is also correct since the RBI is now facing the same issue of counterfeiting the currencies of Rs 500 and Rs 2000 newly launched by the RBI. This has been reported in the annual report of the RBI. Refer to, 'Nevertheless, the RBI report, which points to a spurt in counterfeiting of the new Rs 500 and Rs 2,000 notes, raises the old question all over again.' <br> Statement C is not correct since there is no reference in the passage that the law and order implementing agencies are too excited regarding arresting the offenders. This is completely irrelevant in the context of the information given in the passage. <br> This makes option D the correct choice among the given options.
One Prime for the website and the app, same login. Videos play in the app.
30 questions in 15 minutes, All India rank, streak and explanations. Free: play it here after logging in, or in the app.
Free. Mobile number + OTP, no password.
